Modded SAT Question Bank
by Abdullah Mallik dedicated to DPT SAT Batches and Someone Special | GitHub
We're excited to announce that we've launched a new and improved question bank with enhanced features and a more user-friendly interface.
To access the new question bank, please visit OnePrep.
We believe that this new platform will provide you with a better overall experience. Thank you for your continued support!
Test
Reading and Writing
Domain
Information and Ideas
Skill
Command of Evidence
Difficulty
Medium
ID: d5b9ed0d
Modded SAT Question Bank by Abdullah Mallik
76543210Participants’ mean rating(1–9; higher values = more positive)Helpfulness of reviewAttitude toward reviewed productParticipants’ Responses to Three Review Conditions no anger (control) high anger low anger
  • For each data category, the following bars are shown:
    • no anger (control)
    • high anger
    • low anger
  • The data for the 2 categories are as follows: 
    • Helpfulness of review:
      • no anger (control): 6.75
      • high anger: 6.08
      • low anger: 6.85
    • Attitude toward reviewed product:
      • no anger (control): 2.23
      • high anger: 1.83
      • low anger: 2.15

To understand how expressions of anger in reviews of products affect readers of those reviews, business scholar Dezhi Yin and colleagues measured study participants’ responses to three versions of the same negative review—a control review expressing no anger, a review expressing a high degree of anger, and a review expressing a low degree of anger. Reviewing the data, a student concludes that the mere presence of anger in a review may not negatively affect readers’ perceptions of the review, but a high degree of anger in a review does worsen readers’ perceptions of the review.

Which choice best describes data from the graph that support the students’ conclusion?

  1. On average, participants’ ratings of the helpfulness of the review were substantially higher than were participants’ ratings of the reviewed product regardless of which type of review participants had seen.

  2. Compared with participants who saw the control review, participants who saw the low-anger review rated the review as slightly more helpful, whereas participants who saw the high-anger review rated the review as less helpful. 

  3. Participants who saw the low-anger review rated the review as slightly more helpful than participants who saw the control review did, but participants’ attitude toward the reviewed product was slightly worse when participants saw the low-anger review than when they saw the no-anger review. 

  4. Compared with participants who saw the low-anger review, participants who saw the high-anger review rated the review as less helpful and had a less positive attitude toward the reviewed product. 


Tip: Press CTRL/Command to toggle answer
Correct Answer: B
Rationale

Choice B is the best answer. The claim is that low anger does not negatively affect readers’ perceptions of the review, while high anger does negatively affect readers’ perceptions of the review. This choice accurately expresses the supporting data from the “helpfulness of review” part of the graph: that low-anger reviews were rated as slightly more helpful than no-anger reviews, while high-anger reviews were rated as less helpful than no-anger reviews.

Choice A is incorrect. This choice does not support the conclusion. The conclusion is only about how participants feel about the review itself—the participants’ ratings of the reviewed product are not relevant. Choice C is incorrect. This choice does not support the conclusion. The conclusion is only about how participants feel about the review itself—the participants’ attitude towards the reviewed product is not relevant. Choice D is incorrect. This choice does not support the conclusion. The conclusion is only about how participants feel about the review itself—the participants’ attitude towards the reviewed product is not relevant.

Question Difficulty: Medium
15 / 325 Next