Modded SAT Question Bank
by Abdullah Mallik dedicated to DPT SAT Batches and Someone Special | GitHub
We're excited to announce that we've launched a new and improved question bank with enhanced features and a more user-friendly interface.
To access the new question bank, please visit OnePrep.
We believe that this new platform will provide you with a better overall experience. Thank you for your continued support!
Test
Reading and Writing
Domain
Expression of Ideas
Skill
Rhetorical Synthesis
Difficulty
Medium
ID: 5d3177aa
Modded SAT Question Bank by Abdullah Mallik

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:

  • In the early 1960s, the US had a strict national-origins quota system for immigrants.
  • The number of new immigrants allowed from a country each year was based on how many people from that country lived in the US in 1890.
  • This system favored immigrants from northern Europe.
  • Almost 70% of slots were reserved for immigrants from Great Britain, Ireland, and Germany.
  • The 1965 Hart-Celler Act abolished the national-origins quota system.

The student wants to present the significance of the Hart-Celler Act to an audience unfamiliar with the history of US immigration. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

  1. Almost 70% of slots were reserved for immigrants from Great Britain, Ireland, and Germany at the time the Hart-Celler Act was proposed.

  2. Prior to the Hart-Celler Act, new immigration quotas were based on how many people from each country lived in the US in 1890.

  3. The quota system in place in the early 1960s was abolished by the 1965 Hart-Celler Act. 

  4. The 1965 Hart-Celler Act abolished the national-origins quota system, which favored immigrants from northern Europe.


Tip: Press CTRL/Command to toggle answer
Correct Answer: D
Rationale

Choice D is the best answer. The sentence presents the significance of the Hart-Celler Act to an audience unfamiliar with the history of US immigration, noting that the 1965 act abolished the national-origins quota system and explaining why that mattered, historically: because the old quota system had favored immigrants from northern Europe.

Choice A is incorrect. The sentence describes an aspect of immigration policy at the time the Hart-Celler Act was proposed; it doesn’t present the significance of the Hart-Celler Act to an audience unfamiliar with the history of US immigration. Choice B is incorrect. The sentence describes an aspect of immigration policy before the Hart-Celler Act; it doesn’t describe or present the significance of the act to an audience unfamiliar with the history of US immigration. Choice C is incorrect. While the sentence indicates that the Hart-Celler Act abolished the old quota system, it doesn’t explain the act or the quota system to an audience unfamiliar with the history of US immigration.

Question Difficulty: Medium
126 / 204 Next